No. There is a reason why accusations alone, especially for someone in the public eye, are not worth really anything. Let's just run some fictional numbers to show why:
Let's say that the odds of someone falsely accusing any given person is .01%, so 1/10,000. Sound really solid. Save, a public figure is likely known by millions, We would actually expect 100s of accusers to be false. Worse, because these kinds of accusations are themselves public, it is easy for new accusers to use the existing accusations to tweak their own to make them sound more believable and consistent. And then worst still, because this draws attention, once you start hitting a critical mass, everyone wants in on the action.
In this particular case we also have a lot of the 'friend of a friend' kind of accusations. Even if true, this means we could have 1 incident, loosely recount 50 different ways, making it sound like 50 separate incidents, when it isn't.
I'm not sold either way on this. I know someone personally who claims there is indeed merit to the claims, and I trust this person fairly well, but they themselves are doing a 2nd hand recounting, so it isn't solid enough for me. What I do know, though, is there is a lot of highly suspicious accusations in here as well. That is seriously muddying the waters on the this issue.
