There is nothing wrong with that, problem i have with the story complainers(in many other modern JRPGs as well) , critics are unfairly punishing Engage for focusing on the core gameplay design rather than the 'narrative' , and because its not Four Houses
Intelligent Systems made a worthy Fire Emblem game imho, one that improves on the technical and visuals aspects over its predecessor, and while its also simplistic on the narrative side and 'lacking' some features(that were divisive among the fans) , it is also a high quality strategy game that anyone can enjoy, im having a blast paying it and say its easily one of the best games in the Switch lineup, game is high quality.
I also find bizarre, how Three Houses with such poor graphics and looking ugly as sin on the Switch, got that level of praise while not acknowledging at least how Engage made an effort to upgrade the attack animations, textures, models, etc. Sure, we don't play these games for the visuals only, but alot of effort and care was put into making FE Engage look as good as it does, but it seems everybody assumes its much worse than Three Houses instead of giving it a chance.it also doesn't need 3 campaings
To me the characters are what's important, i don't play these games for the narrative(if i did, i would have missed
many of my favorite games ever lol )FE Engage does have a clumsy plot with silly dialogue and awful VA, but i let it pass because the game is so fun and deserves praise, for what its worth i like how they cleverly include many fan favorite characters into the lore of this title, while making it its own thing, its basically Fire Emblem Warriors but done well (i want to play the Warriors versiom of this game
)