-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Last of Us Part I PC Features Trailer- Ultra-Wide Support, Left Behind, and More
TrebleShot
Member
Once again hahaha
Console hardware is not like for like with PC hardware.
PS5 runs this at 1440p 60fps and 4k40fps which according to these reference specs you need a 4080 to squeeze another 20fps out no RTS.
Console hardware is not like for like with PC hardware.
PS5 runs this at 1440p 60fps and 4k40fps which according to these reference specs you need a 4080 to squeeze another 20fps out no RTS.
Kokoloko85
Member
Interested to see how Steamdeck runs this, Returnal wasn’t bad but not great
ChiefDada
Member
Pretty beefy specs for the PS5 remake that doesn't look better than Pt.2 
Yes, but what's the 6600xt memory bandwidth? Why are you constantly obsessed with teraflops?
PS5 texture settings are always on the highest preset and TLOU Pt 1 textures are immaculate, particularly in cutscenes. I'd be shocked if cards 10GB and below don't struggle immensely.
Yes, but what's the 6600xt memory bandwidth? Why are you constantly obsessed with teraflops?
PS5 texture settings are always on the highest preset and TLOU Pt 1 textures are immaculate, particularly in cutscenes. I'd be shocked if cards 10GB and below don't struggle immensely.
crazepharmacist
Member
I’ve got a 3090. How’s that compare to a 4080 for ultra specs?
RobRSG
Member
Textures are not the only thing consuming VRAM, you know…Pretty beefy specs for the PS5 remake that doesn't look better than Pt.2
Yes, but what's the 6600xt memory bandwidth? Why are you constantly obsessed with teraflops?
PS5 texture settings are always on the highest preset and TLOU Pt 1 textures are immaculate, particularly in cutscenes. I'd be shocked if cards 10GB and below don't struggle immensely.
Hawking Radiation
Member
RTX 4080 for Ultra?
FUCK OFF
FUCK OFF
alphachino
Member
Wonder if it'll have super-ultrawide support
ChiefDada
Member
What I do know is the high quality textures play a large part in making this game look amazing, along with relatively high asset quality in general and the indirect lighting. 10GB and below cards will have a hard time reaching console parity for this title, I suspect. The specs listing specifically surrounding memory and storage tells you all you need to know.
GreatnessRD
Member
1440p with a 5800X3D and 6800 XT about to be butter, baby. I'll grab it when its $49.99 or free if I end up buying another AMD GPU for my living room PC. We'll see. Kinda excited to play it to be honest.
Buggy Loop
Member
You’re basing that from the recommended specs?
Are you new to PC recommended specs?
With console equivalent settings, it’s a pushover.
RobRSG
Member
Until the game releases, your guess is just as good as mine.
yamaci17
Member
oh great ps5 is now a 4070ti
Utherellus
Member
Interesting to observe Sony's strategy: Aiming for this remake as a starting point in their PC-porting campaign for TLOU franchise, inherently familiarizing Naughty Dog engineering team with PC hardware.
I wonder when Part 2 hits PC.
I wonder when Part 2 hits PC.
Last edited:
Black_Stride
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
You are assuming the PS5 is using Ultra settings?
The 6750XT is likely gonna be hitting the 80-90 range at 1440p console settings.
Imma bet a 4080 at console settings at 4K runs close to 100fps.
I wouldnt be shocked if an Intel A770 matches the PS5 at 1440p.
ChiefDada
Member
Lol, PS5 comfortably runs uncapped in 80s fps range at 1440p. And there's no DRS here. Locked 1440p.
GhostNDaBashShell
Member
I have a 4080 and a 4K monitor and even I'm offended at the recommendations. Ultra better have a serious quality jump
GhostNDaBashShell
Member
I have one and plan on buying since there's keys for it and resident evil 4 for 40 bucks but WTF
I'll just end up DLSS since I want more frames at 4K but that shits ridiculous. I'll be posting here on day 1
Buggy Loop
Member
$825, without even looking for deals
Digital Foundry’s console equivalent build with a 6700XT replacing the A770. Hell the 6700XT is too much for just equivalent
Last edited:
8BiTw0LF
Consoomer
But that has come short and locked 1440p in 99% of cases
Buggy Loop
Member
But that has come short and locked 1440p in 99% of cases
Just like consoles
Equivalent is also with the downsides of consoles not pumping native 4K 60 fps most of the time
Black_Stride
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Ohh then the 6750XT is going to be swimming in frames.
Giallo Corsa
Member
GymWolf
Member
I played the thing on ps5 already so i really don't care about it, but those requirements are a bit strange.
Last edited:
rodrigolfp
Gamepads 4 Life
Can I play with mouse+kb without aim assist with minimal input lag on PS5? No, so PC vs PS5 price is irrelevant.
Sanepar
Member
Ps5 doesn't run with ultra settings, probably medium-high settings from PC version. 6750 runs 1440p 60 fps so nothing special on PS5 version
Sanepar
Member
6600 XT is more than enough to have PS5 performance.
ChiefDada
Member
yamaci17
Member
its not, it often run into extreme performance bottleneckes at 1440p and above
literally on it box says 1080p. it is a gpu targeted for 1080p. it can match ps5 like for like at 1080p, but once you go beyond there, it will start having massive performance slowdowns.
here it is like this:
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X Review
The Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X is MSI's dual-fan, triple-slot flagship for AMD's new Full HD gaming champ. The card comes with an overclock out of the box and runs at great temperatures, while operating very quietly.
at 4k, 5700xt is %12 faster
at 1440p, they're matched
at 1080p, 6600xt is %8 faster
that's a whopping %20 performance drop going from 1080p to 4K.
cyberpunk is even more brutal
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X Review
The Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X is MSI's dual-fan, triple-slot flagship for AMD's new Full HD gaming champ. The card comes with an overclock out of the box and runs at great temperatures, while operating very quietly.
at 4k, 5700xt is %23 faster
at 1440p, they're matched
at 1080p, 6600xt is %10 faster
a whopping massive %23 performance drop going from 1440p to 4K and another %10 from 1080p to 1440p
6600xt is a gimped product that only works to its potential at 1080p.
problems are even more pronounced with ray tracing;
at native 1080p with rt set to high (ps5 ray tracing settings), it gets around 50-70 FPS.
ps5 gets these framerates native 4k with its fidelity mode;
as I said, 6600xt has pathetic bandwidth at 256 GB/s. and infinity cache only works good enough at lower resolutions where cache hits are repetetive. at 4k/1440p/ray tracing situations, it falls quite a bit below PS5.
there really exists no GPU that is a proper match for PS5. 6700xt overshoots, 6600xt is a situational gimped card. best way is to compare 6700xt to PS5 and see how much of a lead it has. otherwise comparisons will be moot.
as I said, just because 6600xt matches a PS5 in terms of TFLOPS does not mean it will match it. there are other factors. bandwidth is the most crucial one.
Last edited:
Sanepar
Member
Lucifers Beard
Member
People still obsessed chasing Ultra settings? high is plenty good enough, give me those juicy frames. Gotta upgrade my RAM though, 32GB seems fucking massive…
Depends what kind of magic Naughty Dog does. Uncharted 4 as mentioned before requires a much stronger GPU to run at equivalent settings to the PS5. Maybe this will run better? Who knows.
Black_Stride
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Youre smart enough to know chasing Ultra is a fools errand.....but you are gonna fall for 32GB rec spec for RAM?
Agent_4Seven
Member
No, it is not. Plenty of screens in my comparison thread to show you just that - https://www.neogaf.com/threads/tlou...olutely-not-fair-to-ps3-original-but.1646395/
Mr Moose
Member
It is in fidelity mode.
_yiO4cbD.jpg?width=1200&height=630&fit=crop&enable=upscale&auto=webp)
The Last of Us Part 1 - as complete a remake as you could hope for
John Linneman delivers the full DF tech review, a 50 minute edit that investigates The Last Of Us Part 1's revamped vis…
www.eurogamer.net
Last edited:
Agent_4Seven
Member
Pure BS. There's a ton of DRS or CBR - clearly visble on my screens, plus the overal image is way softer than native 4K is, plenty of games to test and see for yourself, or just wait for PC release and I'll show you.It is in fidelity mode.
The Last of Us Part 1 - as complete a remake as you could hope for
John Linneman delivers the full DF tech review, a 50 minute edit that investigates The Last Of Us Part 1's revamped vis…
Mr Moose
Member
I'm not looking through 409 images. VGTech is very good with pixel counts.
Lucifers Beard
Member
Yeah, I do a few other bits and pieces where I’ve seen usage go up and I typically have other apps open in the background when playing games. I can imagine that more games are going to start asking for 32GB RAM in the not too distant future too. No harm in upgrading while it’s cheapish!
Also, we’ve not played the game yet, that requirement could actually be accurate. We’ll need to wait and see.
Agent_4Seven
Member
Well, that's not my problem. PS5 can't even run Uncharted games in native 4K without visual downgrades (and TLOU P1 is way better visually) - PS4 versions look better and don't have missing effects, lighting etc., not to even mention abysmal local shadows, which is not fixed for the PS5 versions. I'm not turning on PC Master Race here, I'm just telling you that PS5 is not running the game in native 4K, they're using plenty of DRS or CBR or maybe combination of two with something else.
Last edited:
Mr Moose
Member
What pixel counts do you arrive at then?
ChiefDada
Member
Naughty Dog Engine doesn't support DRS or reconstruction. You are probably seeing film grain, which TLOU uses extensively. Get your facts straight before you call BS on someone else.
Agent_4Seven
Member
I've said they're maybe using something else and what exactly I don't and can't know. I'm also not DF and can't lick Sony's ass. But it's not native 4K, nowhere near close. And it's not film grain, c'mon.
It's very hard to tell under close examination, cuz the game is horribly pixelated at times and not telling you anything - on PC in some games you can see or tell with DLSS. I think they maybe using some form of internaly developed image reconstruction like in Quantum Break, cuz I know when I see one, you need to be blind af to not see it on my screens - it ruined plenty of cool screens I made.
That's not native 4K:
Last edited:
ChiefDada
Member
Developer, VGTech, NX Gamer, Digital Foundry: "It's native 4k/fidelity and native 1440p/performance with no DRS"
Guy on NeoGaf: "It's nowhere close to native 4k"
Agent_4Seven
Member
Guy on NeoGaf: "Fuck your BS. You better be ready to take your words back when PC version is ready to be compared in real native 4K."
rodrigolfp
Gamepads 4 Life
Maybe some post anti aliasing they use that makes things blurry.I've said they're maybe using something else and what exactly I don't and can't know. I'm also not DF and can't lick Sony's ass. But it's not native 4K, nowhere near close. And it's not film grain, c'mon.
It's very hard to tell under close examination, cuz the game is horribly pixelated at times and not telling you anything - on PC in some games you can see or tell with DLSS. I think they maybe using some form of internaly developed image reconstruction like in Quantum Break, cuz I know when I see one, you need to be blind af to not see it on my screens - it ruined plenty of cool screens I made.
That's not native 4K:
And it's just one screen out of almost 700.