• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox v.Next and Only Online by Paul Thurrott: Deal With It :)

todahawk

Member
What the hell? No it isn't. Not even close.

If anything, it sounds to me like the system will be optimized to assume that you always have an internet connection, but will probably still work offline, though not as well/with less features. This would naturally make people with bad internet unhappy. I don't see him specifically suggesting that "you can't do much else" in anyway. Way to jump to stupid conclusions.

Have you been on the internet recently?

All the rumors and articles are pointing to an always online requirement for all apps and games. Sources have said you have 3 minutes of non-connection before you're dumped.
 

ultim8p00

Banned
I believe the joke was that the Nextbox would do it automatically without your approval.
Yeah, that's it. That's exactly what he specifically he meant. You can tell because he worded it carefully, and didn't just make a spontaneous joke while completely forgetting that Sony is doing the same thing amirite? lol
 

Paches

Member
I still think Durango will be a success.

- Always online DRM
- Kinect 2.0 focus
- Apparently no interest in courting indies
- Weaker specs than PS4

+ Possibly cheaper than PS4
+ Kinect 2.0 may bring in casuals
+ Has the Halo/Gears/CoD hardcore to lean on
+ Will probably have an eye-wateringly high marketing budget
+ MS will probably throw money at third parties to secure exclusives and exclusive DLC

All they need to do is get Activision to put up exclusive CoD DLC or a timed exclusive release on Durango and throw enough money at third parties in the first year, combined with the 'I play XBOX because my friends do' mentality that XBL created with the 360 and they've already one upped Sony at launch. It's horribly cynical but I think it can happen.

I like how almost all of your pros are a "maybe" or "possibly".
 

todahawk

Member
Actually, that's EXACTLY what Sony is gonna do with their next console.

Hell, they even have a damn button dedicated to annoying your Facebook friends.
Terrible...

No way in hell I'll be using the Share button for Facebook but with the constant video recording in the background? Shit's going up on YouTube.

If they had it on PS3 i'd have a channel full of soul crushing deaths from Demon's & Dark Souls alone.
 

abadguy

Banned
because we have to use those features right?

Oh wait I have a choice..

When was it explicitly stated that you didn't have a choice with Durango? What do you say we wait until the facts are in before deciding how the feature will actually work , eh?
 

ultim8p00

Banned
Have you been on the internet recently?

All the rumors and articles are pointing to an always online requirement for all apps and games. Sources have said you have 3 minutes of non-connection before you're dumped.

Yeah, but I'm not talking about rumors. I'm talking about what this guy supposedly with a reliable source said, and the ridiculous conclusions people are making based on his words.
 

Mifune

Mehmber
This is terrible. One of the big MS insiders basically confirming always-online. And on the tech podcast he said it would be "expensive" like 500 or 300 with subsidized plan.
 
Have you been on the internet recently?

All the rumors and articles are pointing to an always online requirement for all apps and games. Sources have said you have 3 minutes of non-connection before you're dumped.

Well, apps would require an online connection. Games is the worrying aspect and while the rumours all but confirm there's a mandatory always online requirement, there's still a sliver of hope some will hold onto until it's actually confirmed by MS.

Can't blame them for being in denial, who would ever have thought a console would have a mandatory always online requirement?
 

ELRenoRaven

Member
Biggest issue for me right here. Some people will say it isn't an issue but holy fuck at that mode of thought.

Exactly. with an Always online required future you're only renting your games. That's bullshit. That's why they could have every damn developer in the world exclusive to the next Xbox and I still wouldn't buy it. There are plenty of old games to play.
 

Sorian

Banned
Yeah, but I'm not talking about rumors. I'm talking about what this guy supposedly with a reliable source said, and the ridiculous conclusions people are making based on his words.

He is just as much a rumor mill as anyone else. Do his words make you happier so it pleases you to jump on his more?
 

Osiris

I permanently banned my 6 year old daughter from using the PS4 for mistakenly sending grief reports as it's too hard to watch or talk to her
And on the tech podcast he said it would be "expensive" like 500 or 300 with subsidized plan.

That would be hilarious. (and suicidal for the xbox division).

No way, can't see it.
 

Into

Member
What happens in 10 years when Microsoft decides they want to shutdown the 720's servers? How will you play your games?

This

This is way worse than 599 or carts ever were, you think spending 599 on a overpriced PS3 at launch was bad. Now you are spending hundreds of dollars into products that can be switched "off" by the company at any point. You no longer own anything you purchase there

They will gladly pull the switch on a older Halo game, so that they can sell a newer one, see Halo 2.

That is indefensible on every level, you are spending 60 dollars game, plus possible DLC, micro transactions, addons, subscriptions to Live, subscriptions to other services or MMOs and you still wont own the game you are playing.

You are leasing it. That is much worse than the nogame.jpg grill 599 giant enemy crab in every way possible.

If you want to make any excuses for this and defend it, you go right ahead. But not me, i am not throwing money away on lending games and have nothing at the end.
 
I really don't understand why Microsoft would do this... at every turn it has been hard to believe that they would do something so hubristic. Why would they turn their backs on the people who made them successful?

OMX7


Uncle Neogaf: “Will, it’s alright to be angry at the Next Xbox.”

Will: “Hey, why should I be mad? I’m saying, at least he gave hardcores some lip service this time. I just wish I hadn’t wasted my money buying this stupid present.”

Uncle Neogaf: “I’m sorry, I, you know, Always-Online, Kinect 2.0, no used games, if there was… something that I could do–”

OMVH


Will: “Hey, you know what? You ain’t got to do nothing, Uncle Neogaf. Hey, you know? Ain’t like I’m still five-years old, you know? Ain’t like I’m going to be sitting up every night, playing Halo, asking my Mom, ‘When’s the next Xbox coming home?’ You know? Who needs Xbox? Hey, he wasn’t there to teach me how to shoot my first headshot, but I learned, didn’t I? Hey I got pretty damned good at it too, didn’t I Uncle Neogaf?”

Uncle Neogaf: “Yeah, you did.”

Will: “Got through my first platformer without him, right? I learned how to drive, I learned how to spend skill points, I learned how to fight without him. I had FIVE great console generations without him! He never even sent me a damn Xbox Live Points card–TO HELL WITH HIM!”

[Pause]

Will: “I didn’t need him them and I don’t need him now.”

Uncle Neogaf: “Will…”

Will: “Nah, you know what Uncle Neogaf? I’m gonna get through Next Gen without him. I’m gonna get in great Driveclub without him. I’m gonna start my own videogame company, and I’m making me a whole bunch of consoles and they will work offline, I’m gonna be a better platform holder than he ever was, and I sure as hell don’t need him for that, ’cause there ain’t a damn thing he could ever teach me about how to love my games!”

[Pause]

Will: “How come he don’t want me, man?”

OMVJ


OMX5
I fucking love Gaf.
 

Iacobellis

Junior Member
I really don't understand why Microsoft would do this... at every turn it has been hard to believe that they would do something so hubristic. Why would they turn their backs on the people who made them successful?

OMX7


Uncle Neogaf: “Will, it’s alright to be angry at the Next Xbox.”

Will: “Hey, why should I be mad? I’m saying, at least he gave hardcores some lip service this time. I just wish I hadn’t wasted my money buying this stupid present.”

Uncle Neogaf: “I’m sorry, I, you know, Always-Online, Kinect 2.0, no used games, if there was… something that I could do–”

OMVH


Will: “Hey, you know what? You ain’t got to do nothing, Uncle Neogaf. Hey, you know? Ain’t like I’m still five-years old, you know? Ain’t like I’m going to be sitting up every night, playing Halo, asking my Mom, ‘When’s the next Xbox coming home?’ You know? Who needs Xbox? Hey, he wasn’t there to teach me how to shoot my first headshot, but I learned, didn’t I? Hey I got pretty damned good at it too, didn’t I Uncle Neogaf?”

Uncle Neogaf: “Yeah, you did.”

Will: “Got through my first platformer without him, right? I learned how to drive, I learned how to spend skill points, I learned how to fight without him. I had FIVE great console generations without him! He never even sent me a damn Xbox Live Points card–TO HELL WITH HIM!”

[Pause]

Will: “I didn’t need him them and I don’t need him now.”

Uncle Neogaf: “Will…”

Will: “Nah, you know what Uncle Neogaf? I’m gonna get through Next Gen without him. I’m gonna get in great Driveclub without him. I’m gonna start my own videogame company, and I’m making me a whole bunch of consoles and they will work offline, I’m gonna be a better platform holder than he ever was, and I sure as hell don’t need him for that, ’cause there ain’t a damn thing he could ever teach me about how to love my games!”

[Pause]

Will: “How come he don’t want me, man?”

OMVJ


OMX5

WHY AM I FUCKING CRYING?
 

Cidd

Member
There you go again, misconstruing rumors as facts.

I'm not the one jumping to conclusions here, I didn't even mention anything about the Durango always need to be on twitter/facebook. you're the one that brought the PS4 into this discussion.

And from what Sony showed everything seemed optional.
 

mavs

Member
Yeah, but I'm not talking about rumors. I'm talking about what this guy supposedly with a reliable source said, and the ridiculous conclusions people are making based on his words.

There are other people with supposedly reliable sources. He said the same thing they said. Lose network connection, no gaming.
 

vg260

Member
Disagree about activating once and then going offline. I don't see MS doing that. There's way too many benefits for them doing always online.

That's my prediction: Need to be online to download/activate it once, then tied to your console so any account can play it offline without the disc. You need to be online on another console to use it there. Just like how XBLA/GoD games work now.

Maybe I'm being too optimistic, but I feel like the rumors aren't certain enough to rule this option out. We'll see.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
I think the big deal, and what would separate it from the 360, is that this would also apply to retail disc games, not just downloaded XBLA/GoD games. So it potentially rules out used games (like Steamworks retail disc games)

That also ties into the rumor of not needing the disc to play a retail game after you install it. This also could mean all developers may have to account for this (like defaulting to a trial mode, or something like that), which could be the source of the rumors.
I can see this happening too, the rumours just aren't skewing that way.

We'll see come May 21st.
 

0xCA2

Member
At first I was really upset, but now I'm starting to realize that, in concept, regardless of the always online/kinect stuff, the 720 might actually be a cool box. We really don't know much about it's software features, but a super-powered Roku/cable box that can play games sounds kind of neat (even if it isn't what I personally want). Plus you have the fact that it has Windows integrated into it, maybe it could function as a PC on some level?

The always online issue is pretty much Microsoft willingly forfeiting consumers to Sony, which is intriguing in a way. They are just not offering that kind of box. I'm starting to believe that they don't care about being "number one" anymore in pure console sales.

Either way, if they really have cut deals with cable companies to offer it for cheap with a subscription, I know many people would buy one regardless of the BS involved, and it'd may be a pretty functional solution for them because of the low price.

I'm fine with two competing consoles with opposite visions driving them, as long as that anti-consumer stuff does not rub off on the PS4 (what I want ) :-D.
 

DopeyFish

Not bitter, just unsweetened
I'm struggling to think of anything the regime described by Kotaku can bring that cannot be done with a platform that is neutral about whether the machine is connected or not.

Software can require and use net connections if it wants. Every feature I've ever seen suggested in this context can be done without a universal connection requirement across all software. Why force it? What benefit to force it on a platform level if it's not necessary? The only benefits I can see are for MS.

Having always online (from MS POV): a) enhanced security b) better loss prevention/risk mitigation c) increased license mobility A can be managed without a persistent online connection, B really benefits from it but C... C is incredibly interesting for consumers, especially. If they shut everything down then it sucks... But you can have interesting scenarios occur to satisfy consumers (basically taking steam to an awesome new level) and also ease the frustrations of publishers and developers

People complain about server uptime and stability... But Xbox Live has been magnificent in this regard. Only a few unplanned outages in 10.5 years.

Microsoft took a gamble going broadband only with Xbox 1- the always connected model is actually less of a risk relative to that as FTTH rollout starts overtaking DSL in large city centers across the planet - even my connection I consider flakey but in likely 2 years it'll be replaced by fiber- a lot of dark fiber across the world right now - this is why Microsoft is expected to launch cloud gaming a couple years in instead of at launch- fiber is picking up huge and quickly- when xbox live launched there was more dial-up users than DSL/Cable users... Now? Wtf is dial-up?

People just assume the worst, then use rare examples like their router is flakey (not MS problem), their connection is flakey (ping home times can be adjusted), moving to a new house, rural broadband availability (even though 95% of US households have access to broadband, 95% of Europe as of 2 years ago) and the key countries in Asia have great buildout too. The methodology will possibility be different for countries like Russia, Brazil, China but no guarantees.

I see some really awesome upcoming concepts like their multi screen strategy and the connectivity going forward. Now I won't need to use awkward RDP protocols to access some content... Imagine if they stream the TV too... Like an added slingplayer in the house without the Internet discovery... To me? That's awesome stuff. I want to see what comes from an always connected approach as its a forward thinking strategy. Is is going to be perfect? Likely not. Nothing ever is. But I'm not going to sit here and piss on something we have no fucking clue about.
 

P90

Member
Quote:

2) He could have been more tactful, but let’s face it, people are way too sensitive online.

3) The biggest issue here, frankly, was the cyberbullying that occurred in the wake of Orth’s comments. Those sensitive people aren’t so sensitive when it comes to other people, that’s for sure. In fact, that’s my exact definition of a bully.

Bingo. I agree 100%.
 

ultim8p00

Banned
He is just as much a rumor mill as anyone else. Do his words make you happier so it pleases you to jump on his more?

He may be, I suppose. But I wasn't necessarily talking about his credibility here. I was talking about the conclusions you made from his rumor. Not talking about anything else here man.

Personally, I'm not sure what to make of all the rumors. It seems to me the Durango will be optimized for always online, but there has to be some level of offline functionality. Most likely you will have access to basic functionality, but not much else since it will require internet. I'm not sure about the 3 second rumor. It seems a little...stupid...to me and I think maybe that was something they threw around, but I doubt it would make it into the final box. That's what I think, if you actually want to know. His words don't make me any happier or sadder. I'll wait until I hear something official, then I'll decided if I should also get a Durango.
 

DesertFox

Member
If that is the case then doesn't PS4 win anyway. It seems like Sony is taking the stance that a console is meant for gaming with other things being icing on the cake while Microsoft is taking the stance that a console should do everything in your living room including give blowjobs, oh and game are kind of cool too.

As awesome as Sony's 1st party lineup is - how do the sales compare to third party titles that are on both consoles? I'd be curious to see the sum of Sony 1st party title sales in 2012 compared to the sales of the 2012 CoD title. Again... it's the uninformed masses that really drive the business...
 

Sorian

Banned
He may be, I suppose. But I wasn't necessarily talking about his credibility here. I was talking about the conclusions you made from his rumor. Not talking about anything else here man.

Personally, I'm not sure what to make of all the rumors. It seems to me the Durango will be optimized for always on, but there has to be some level of offline functionality. I'm not sure about the 3 second rumor. It seems a little...stupid...to me and I think maybe that was something they threw around, but I doubt it would make it into the final box. That's what I think, if you actually want to know. His words don't make me any happier or sadder. I'll wait until I hear something official, then I'll decided if I should also get a Durango.

I'm not nit picking to be a dick, I'm nitpicking because it kind of changes the level of what we are discussing. You know it is a 3 minute rumor right? Not a 3 second rumor. The only reason I say that is because everyone would find 3 seconds to be ridiculous. At least with 3 minutes, a board room of old men who know nothing about technology could be convinced that that is plenty of time.
 

Flatline

Banned
How does a company's success affect you in a negative way? I don't understand these biased statements. Unless you're concerned that other companies will jump on the 'always-online' bandwagon?


When an asshole company uses abhorrent anti-consumer tactics and idiots go buy their shitty product anyway their competitors will eventually adopt their crappy tactics because they know they have something to gain and nothing to lose.

But if Microsoft is made an example by us the always-onlike DRM bullshit will fail. So yeah, by buying that crap you affect me.
 

Tratorn

Member
Sadly his words aren't 100% clear again.
He should just say "you can't play singleplayer-games offline" or "of course you can play singleplayer-games offline".
 
So what is the positive, Microsoft?


isn't hacking rampant on the xbox? what about bootlegged games? well that's two problems that an always online connection solves right there....oh you meant for the end user....for them, nothing.

here come the nightmares. :(
image.php
 

Limanima

Member
I still think Durango will be a success.

- Always online DRM
- Kinect 2.0 focus
- Apparently no interest in courting indies
- Weaker specs than PS4

+ Possibly cheaper than PS4
+ Kinect 2.0 may bring in casuals
+ Has the Halo/Gears/CoD hardcore to lean on
+ Will probably have an eye-wateringly high marketing budget
+ MS will probably throw money at third parties to secure exclusives and exclusive DLC

All they need to do is get Activision to put up exclusive CoD DLC or a timed exclusive release on Durango and throw enough money at third parties in the first year, combined with the 'I play XBOX because my friends do' mentality that XBL created with the 360 and they've already one upped Sony at launch. It's horribly cynical but I think it can happen.

The casuals already bought a Wii, this people will never going to buy consoles again. There's a reason WiiU is failing.
 
Cyber bullying is quickly becoming the shelter for people who pick a fight they no longer want to participate in.

How do you fight against people who hide behind anonymity that say the most outlandish things? Some people are reasonable, some aren't.
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
Sadly his words aren't 100% clear again.
He should just say "you can't play singleplayer-games offline" or "of course you can play singleplayer-games offline".

On the podcast there is no ambiguity. He says: "must be internet connected to use"
 
It's really unfortunate to see some of you talk shit about Paul Thurrott without knowing anything about him or his site. You see his site brand itself as the "supersite for Windows" and automatically go into internet gamer rage mode.

Paul's site has been a great source for Microsoft-related info for years now, one I can go to quite often and get a no-bullshit preview/review on upcoming Microsoft products, namely Windows, Office, etc. No, he isn't a Microsoft shrill, he does honestly tell it like it is. If he doesn't like something in a new Windows release, he'll say it. If he does like something, he'll say it.

He really hits the nail on the head in that article with these bits:

2) He could have been more tactful, but let’s face it, people are way too sensitive online.

3) The biggest issue here, frankly, was the cyberbullying that occurred in the wake of Orth’s comments. Those sensitive people aren’t so sensitive when it comes to other people, that’s for sure. In fact, that’s my exact definition of a bully.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
Having always online (from MS POV): a) enhanced security b) better loss prevention/risk mitigation c) increased license mobility A can be managed without a persistent online connection, B really benefits from it but C... C is incredibly interesting for consumers, especially.

There's, of course, benefits for MS.

But in terms of benefits for the customer, I would be curious about an elaboration on c). If we're talking about gifting games, that could be allowed without constant online checks.
 
Top Bottom