JunkerWoland
Member
My point is merely that the EU releases still appear to maintain the lens flare, meaning all versions of the game are not the "same." Beyond that, draw your own conclusions.
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Sony cracks down on sexual content in games.
- Thread starter kingbean
- Start date
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
Because the US branch is the one dictating those changes of policies and personell.
Also, Steam took Super Seducer, to reply to the question above.
Hecaton117
Member
I just remembered this, but the same people who are trying to equate most or all stylized Japanese art to pedophilia are the same people who thought that Ada Wong in Resident Evil 2 Remake looked underage.
Just in case you were under the illusion that there was some kind of reasonable standard at work here.
Just in case you were under the illusion that there was some kind of reasonable standard at work here.
CatCouch
Member
Really? What's the story behind this? I've never heard that one before. Arguing that Ada Wong is underage is some Dragon's Crown Sorceress "lolicon fantasy" level nonsense.
Hecaton117
Member
When Ada Wong's redesign got leaked there were the usual people making comments about her looking underage. Here's a random page from one of the threads and just on here you can see people discussing those comments.
CatCouch
Member
Wow, someone tried to argue that Ada Wong is a High School moe trope. This is quite the case of seeing what you want to see. What those people want to see is underage, I guess.
At least there was a lot of push back on the underage comments.
One post brings up an iteresting point by suggesting people could have a skewed idea of what a teenager looks like because they base it off of TV shows that cast people in their 20's in High School roles.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Meanwhile I bet they all love Riverdale. Which gets pretty damn raunchy for a “high school” kid show.
Senhua
Member
Beside obvious thing like Orientals vs Caucasian physical difference, mainly that because the difference of culture to perceive beauty in regard for women.
This is 22 years old female in Japan
And this is teenager in US
Of course uneducated western "journalist" and SJW will find it look underage without care to understand the context.
Also:
Last edited:
majestix1988
Member
only problem on such censorship system of Sony is that makes mistrust on gamers if the game is multiplatform such that Senra Kagura game that lose intimacy mode or even laserlights or even just mist on bathtub makes it asking is this a better version for console or just vandalism on this game due Sony has right to censorship it? while on other consoles or pc has no censorship issue
Last edited:
So the US branch likes to ban asses in the EU but allow them in the US. Makes no sense.
Steam took it and that has a reputation for little to no curation which I'm also fine with. Did xbox take it? No.
Go through your list:
Which of these games are actually on the xbox platform in any form let alone uncensored?
Before you say but that's because they are Japanese games what about super seducer? Why didn't that show up? Because most platform holders have some form of curation.
Sony was lax over the years it got a lot of shit for having these type of games. It got a lot of shit for Dragons crown. It got a lot of shit for God of war 3 sex scenes, the Vita became a meme for anime waifu system when support was dying. Its curation for the PS4 is now actually like the other platform which they compete with because they can afford to do that. The other platform seems to get no complaints weirdly and is doing fine.
I don't agree with this new curation as I see no reason to alienate that sector which you had before but this talk of arrogance, SJWs at California, and people moving to xbox is more political and console war chest beating than grounded in reality.
I see talk of violence being fine too but you have had censoring of violence in the EU and Australia for Last of Us, God Of War 3, and sexual abuse in South Park stick of truth etc in previous gens. Nothing to do with SJW in the US. I feel this has become some big controversy now because people want it to be.
Last edited:
It could be that the message to uncensor the game has not reached the European side (SCIE), or that Europe is actually keeping it censored (which means not only California, but Sony Europe is also part of the problem).
Either way, that doesn't change the fact these new guidelines were set "in the wake of the #metoo movement", which was around the time PlayStation HQ moved from Japan to California in 2016.
Either way, that doesn't change the fact these new guidelines were set "in the wake of the #metoo movement", which was around the time PlayStation HQ moved from Japan to California in 2016.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
Citation needed that Steam does not curate their games, they curate just as much as the other platforms, they even have rules and regulations in place.
Also, yes, the California branch dictates all the curation process because this is where the Sony HQ is now!
Because as you noted, Xbox has 0 pressence in Japan. Also the Super Seducer guy has said he will bring all Super Seducer games to Switch, at one point, so there is that. No mention of XBone, but that console is dead outside of the typical FPS or so.
And since you brought Super Seducer, I see that and I raise you Dream Daddy: Dad Dating Simulator. Sony banned Super Seducer, a heterosexual simmulator which in the store page this little gem exists:
I mean, what exactly is comfortable with post-teens dating dads? So tell me, what makes Dream Daddy bonno and Super Seducer bad?
Also, keep that above-mentioned title, here. Also keep the lesbian kiss
No one gave a shit for Dragons Crown except that cucked, beta, soyboy Schreier, God of War 3 scenes were only lambasted in OldGaf, Vita was dead on the water.
But, let me ask you, assuming all of those are true, and Sony got in "a lot of shit" for those games, answer me this: Sony is trying to breach China as we all know, is trying to put a foothold on the China market.
Now, Sony goes out of their way to add a 100% homosexual game in their store, Dream Daddy, in a country where homosexuality is banned and distribution of it is penalized by law.
Not only that, but Sony's flagship series, The Last of Us 2 is having a confirmed lesbian relationship and 1/4 of the cinematic trailer was focused on said homosexual relationship.
And Sony will publish this game in China (and M.East) so, tell me, how much shit is going to take for this game from BY FAR the largest market in the world?
Shilling 101: All the others are shills, NOT ME!!!!
CatCouch
Member
I'm a little confused by your post. I see no evidence that Microsoft is denying games. "Did xbox take it? No." Was Super Seducer presented to Microsoft and denied? I'm unaware of that.
The Switch is getting or already has a number of the games on that list uncensored. As far as I can tell, Sony is the only platform blocking content in these games. Steam has the Nekopara games (I bought Vol. 1!) and Senran Kagura Renewal without the Sony censorship. The Switch also has Nekopara, DOA Xtreme 3 and the more risque Senran Kagura spin-offs like Peach Ball, which is rated by the ESRB and is releasing this summer in NA. The Switch is also getting Super Neptunia RPG uncensored while the PS4 versions is edited, Mary Skelter 2 and an Omaga Labyrinth game (not sure if it's the same one or a different game than Z).
I'm pretty sure these games aren't on the Xbox because there is no real market for them, they weren't ported. Who knows, that might even change. More Japanese games have been releasing on the Xbox one in the last year or so. I know because I buy them!
Omega Supreme Holopsicon
Member
cm osi
Member
well i always was on plystation because it was the way to get japanese games but i guess it's not the place anymore. i'll have to upgrade my pc instead of getting a ps5
true that they seems to allow more liberty (even themselves with fire emblem and xenoblade) but i wouldn't trust nintendo too much
I know who I am choosing.
true that they seems to allow more liberty (even themselves with fire emblem and xenoblade) but i wouldn't trust nintendo too much
Last edited:
Why is it confusing?
Again you mention steam for your titles, and switch for others.
Why wouldn't super seducer be presented for the xbox? It's not a japanese game so why wouldn't there be a market for it there and the developer not want to release it there, especially as it is a simple fmv game with a PC release already.
Since you say the xbox is getting more Japanese games why hasn't it got ANY of these specific ones? you seem to enjoy buying other games for xbox so why not complain that it's not getting any of these type of games you love at all rather than complaining that some specific thing is censored on the platform that has them? Why would anyone who enjoys these type of games recommend an xbox in this thread like some are here? That's what I'm saying makes no sense and is console war chest beating or stirring up controversy for it. The same for SJW at Cali affecting EU releases but allowing the things they are apparently against in the US version being some political bullshit. This thread needs to be more rational.
Buy games uncensored and show that there is a strong market for your specific type of game. This has nothing to do with not allowing boobs completely and I'm sure most in this thread are aware of that. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water like some are doing here.
Last edited:
Steam has a reputation for not curating as much which I actually like. Not sure how you can argue against that with some of the things that can be found on steam.
So let me see Sony US HQ curated for the EU and Australia but not for their own US market. Those psychotic SJWs at Cali, I tell you. Come on now.
Last edited:
squarealex
Member
Many child play GTA, so no, is not enough
Shmunter
Member
Lol
GermanZepp
Member
That's parents responsibility. Would you aloud censorship in mk11 cause children can play it?
Hecaton117
Member
Reading through Era's version of this thread is sad.
There are some unfortunate components at work here.
Such as westerners generally being poor judges of age when it comes to asians. There are tons of examples of people posting images of Japanese women in particular and assuming that they are under 18 when they are well into their 20s or 30s.
Consider that Japan's population is 98.5% native Japanese. So most if not all of the images that make up the general standard of beauty there are generally going to be the sorts that some westerners are going to automatically parse as "underage".
Consider that anime like other forms of stylized art are abstractions of reality. That means you take something real like a human and exaggerate certain qualities to produce a particular style. If the models you're abstracting are something that some westerners automatically parse as underage then it's absolutely no surprise that the same happens to abstracted versions of these humans.
Generally when people interact with stylized media, they realize that they are not looking at photo-realistic depictions of humans so they generally look for context clues to find out what the age of certain characters are supposed to be.
Even then we can have disagreements over what particular age we think any given character is because styles are not homogenized, and particular details are interpreted differently by different people and artists. So we can have two artists draw the same thing and come out with very different results because of how they personally intepret what we ask them to draw.
I'll state this now, using your personal interpretation of art as a metric by which you should attack other people for having different interpretations pretty much always leads to absurdity. I can see someone making arguments for characters that are anatomically similar to an actual child. But trying to split hairs over the age of an adult bodied characters because you think their eyes are too big is really fucking dumb.
So you have situations for example like Jojo where looking at the characters some would probably interpret them to be 20+ when you have characters like Jotaro that are actually 17.
Ask yourself, if someone told you that they think Jotaro is sexually attractive would you call them a pedophile because their stated age is 17? If that person interprets Jotaro as much older than that should they be punished? Some would say yes so consider this following scenario.
If you're watching a live action TV show starring a bunch of teenagers in high school, but all of the characters involved are actors that are well in their 20s and 30s, are you a pedophile if you're attracted to characters that have an in universe age of 16-17 but their actually 25 or 35 or whatever in real life and you interpret them as so? I think a reasonable person would assume that you are out of your fucking mind if you think that someone being attracted to an actor that they interpret as older (in this case because they know they are) is a pedophile for doing so.
Just like with stylized media, where interpretations are different from person to person, persecuting people because of splitting hairs on perceived age is just plainly idiotic. The shoe can easily be on the other foot here, someone can call someone else a pedophile because they perceived character A as 17 while getting called pedophile themselves because another person interpreted what they like as underage.
Unfortunately for Japanese artists there isn't any winning here. I mean when the examples we have of "underage" characters are Dragon Crown's Sorceress for stylized and Ada Wong for something more realistic as examples of "underage" characters there's no reasonable metric by which a Japanese artist can ensure they won't get attacked by these people outside of hoping for luck of the draw.
There was a third example I had in mind but I forgot it while I was writing this out.
There are some unfortunate components at work here.
Such as westerners generally being poor judges of age when it comes to asians. There are tons of examples of people posting images of Japanese women in particular and assuming that they are under 18 when they are well into their 20s or 30s.
Consider that Japan's population is 98.5% native Japanese. So most if not all of the images that make up the general standard of beauty there are generally going to be the sorts that some westerners are going to automatically parse as "underage".
Consider that anime like other forms of stylized art are abstractions of reality. That means you take something real like a human and exaggerate certain qualities to produce a particular style. If the models you're abstracting are something that some westerners automatically parse as underage then it's absolutely no surprise that the same happens to abstracted versions of these humans.
Generally when people interact with stylized media, they realize that they are not looking at photo-realistic depictions of humans so they generally look for context clues to find out what the age of certain characters are supposed to be.
Even then we can have disagreements over what particular age we think any given character is because styles are not homogenized, and particular details are interpreted differently by different people and artists. So we can have two artists draw the same thing and come out with very different results because of how they personally intepret what we ask them to draw.
I'll state this now, using your personal interpretation of art as a metric by which you should attack other people for having different interpretations pretty much always leads to absurdity. I can see someone making arguments for characters that are anatomically similar to an actual child. But trying to split hairs over the age of an adult bodied characters because you think their eyes are too big is really fucking dumb.
So you have situations for example like Jojo where looking at the characters some would probably interpret them to be 20+ when you have characters like Jotaro that are actually 17.
Ask yourself, if someone told you that they think Jotaro is sexually attractive would you call them a pedophile because their stated age is 17? If that person interprets Jotaro as much older than that should they be punished? Some would say yes so consider this following scenario.
If you're watching a live action TV show starring a bunch of teenagers in high school, but all of the characters involved are actors that are well in their 20s and 30s, are you a pedophile if you're attracted to characters that have an in universe age of 16-17 but their actually 25 or 35 or whatever in real life and you interpret them as so? I think a reasonable person would assume that you are out of your fucking mind if you think that someone being attracted to an actor that they interpret as older (in this case because they know they are) is a pedophile for doing so.
Just like with stylized media, where interpretations are different from person to person, persecuting people because of splitting hairs on perceived age is just plainly idiotic. The shoe can easily be on the other foot here, someone can call someone else a pedophile because they perceived character A as 17 while getting called pedophile themselves because another person interpreted what they like as underage.
Unfortunately for Japanese artists there isn't any winning here. I mean when the examples we have of "underage" characters are Dragon Crown's Sorceress for stylized and Ada Wong for something more realistic as examples of "underage" characters there's no reasonable metric by which a Japanese artist can ensure they won't get attacked by these people outside of hoping for luck of the draw.
There was a third example I had in mind but I forgot it while I was writing this out.
Last edited:
Claus Grimhildyr
Vincit qui se vincit
Beside obvious thing like Orientals vs Caucasian physical difference, mainly that because the difference of culture to perceive beauty in regard for women.
This is 22 years old female in Japan
And this is teenager in US
Of course uneducated western "journalist" and SJW will find it look underage without care to understand the context.
Also:
"Rocksy Light" - a NSFW model that would make these people's heads spin.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
Instead of damage control would find it more appropriate to cite your claims and answer my questions?
Which questions would that be? Why there is a lesbian kiss or why there are other similar games?
What damage control
Last edited:
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
Exactly, why Sony is hosting Dream Daddy after refusing to host Super Seducer, why is there a lesbian kiss on a game that Sony is developing, why are there 2 14 year olds kissing mouth-to-mouth in a game Sony has developed and how Sony not wanting to get in trouble colliding with them wishing to enter the Chinese market, but host and distribute games with homosexual themes in their platform?
majestix1988
Member
Can you accept that our Games is Inferior Version than other console version due its has Censorship?
Because you making a comparison of a lesbian kiss to games like this where they removed the ability to fondle tits disingenuous as fuck:
there is a difference which you refuse to see in a scene like that. It's like saying why doesn't HBO allow porn but allows game of thrones. Sure I can see the argument that perhaps both have something sexual happening but you are choosing to miss the wood for the trees.
And just to point out I have nothing against porn but HBO can curate what they are all the same.
Last edited:
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
1. I also stated that they also had 2 14 year olds that were going mouth-to-mouth, which you conveniently ignored.
2. Your example is irrelevant, Sony is developing a homosexual-themed game and is also marketing and selling PS4s in China, you know, China, where creation and distribution of homosexual content is penalized, so, by your own yardstick, Sony got and will get "A lot of shit" by publishing such a game in there, yet, they don't seem to care, so why only heterosexual-pleasing games that no one has ever heard of before need to get censored?
I have an interest exercise for you, go to your PS4, power it on, then go to its internet browser and type "Pornhub", after that, click on the first link.
Is Sony going to drop PS+ and online functionality from their console, since kids can browse porn using their PS4s?
How did I ignore it when I directly referenced it. Pornhub on a browser is not content sold by Sony and I don't see the relevance. We are done here.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
You addressed nothing, and PS4 has a browser installed from the get-go, but anyhow, we are done here, hope your paycheck is worth the effort.
majestix1988
Member
feels like offtopic........mostly now entering soft porn..........instead talking about SOny's Censorship
Hope yours was, don't think I don't remember you from 2013 alt account. Do you also watch porn on your sony TV? Sony are endorsing PORN!!
The fact that you don't see the difference between a browser and a store is ridiculous.
Last edited:
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
I only joined here at 2018 but keep at it. It is not the only thing you got wrong in this thread.
The_Mike
I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
Because two reasons:
1. TLoU2 is a Sony exclusive
2. Lesbians are SJW oriented politics, and therefore gets a pass.
Also, there's a difference between kissing and nudity.
majestix1988
Member
Dont use age due every country has different age of consen like japan is on 13 this thing can be pass or not any person due its just pure fantasy story or such.......if you put realism on this fantasy theory mostly this thing are just on endless of win or lose situation or vice versa
Last edited:
I made myself clear already before you posted
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
I made myself clear already before you posted
You are still wrong, I only joined here on 2018.
But like I said, keep being wrong and keep ignoring the facts that are presented in front of you.
majestix1988
Member
and restart now.....now i will start this discussion again + why we dont like censorship on the games on we gonna play on future consoles....now question?
Can you accept that our Multiplatform Games is Inferior Version than other console version due its has Censorship? (we can accept it on Exclusive games like on Wii U that Xenoblade Chronicles X or that SMT X FE game due its just one version on worldwide release but some didnt like it due its lack of appeal or some off-shoot stories issue like on smt x fe)
Can you accept that our Multiplatform Games is Inferior Version than other console version due its has Censorship? (we can accept it on Exclusive games like on Wii U that Xenoblade Chronicles X or that SMT X FE game due its just one version on worldwide release but some didnt like it due its lack of appeal or some off-shoot stories issue like on smt x fe)
There is even nudity. Shock horror in a third party game like Conan Exiles. It was even endorsed on PS+. You get tits. Nothing to do with being sony exclusive or SJWs.
What facts are those when you completely ignore everything said and bring up ridiculous stuff like removing browsers. I guess sony should stop selling TVs too because somebody could watch a snuff movie on it somewhere. If you honestly don't see the difference and are going to resort to irrelevant hyperbole what's the point of continuing and pretending you have 'facts'.
Sorry majestics if it seems like you have been ignored but it's because it's unclear who you are addressing or asking in your posts. If you are talking to me then yeah I agree that compared to the steam and switch versions of some of these games you won't get them and you should buy the version that has what you want whether that is graphics, performance, boobs or whatever.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
OK, let's start once more.
1.Why Sony banned Super Seducer 2 from entering their store?
2.Why Sony allowed and (based on their Twitter) celebrated them bringing Dream Daddy a gay dating simulator in their Store?
3.Where is your citation that Steam does not curate their Store as good as the other three platform holders?
4.You said Sony got "in a lot of shit" because of the sexual nature and sexual scenes in Dragon's Dogma and God of War 3, respectively, if this is true.
A.Why is Sony a company that is selling to China, a country that you can get penalized for distributing homosexual content developing The Last of Us 2?
B.Is Sony going to delete the 14-year-old or patch it, scene from TloU: Left behind DLC as to "not get a lot of shit" from the Chinese market? Yes or No?
CatCouch
Member
I don't understand your point about Super Seducer. Has the game been blocked by Microsoft?
I honestly believe it's hard for this thread to be rational because Sony's actions are not rational.
I am buying games uncensored when I can. Why downplay Steam and the Switch? Both have uncensored versions of games that are edited on the PS4. The WSJ article makes it clear that Sony censors content while Nintendo follows the rating boards. Microsoft declined to comment but I see no evidence that to suggest Microsoft is blocking any content. A game not being released on Xbox One is not the same as being blocked.
I also play my Xbox a lot so I buy games available there. It's worked out better for me than I thought it would since DMC V had unexpected censorship for whatever reason (and still does in some regions) while Dead Or Alive 6 lacks the ability to buy outfits separately on the PS4 in NA. I can't guess why that is but I can and have bought outfits separately on the XBox One version of the game. If given the choice I will buy on Xbox or Switch over the PS4.
I do not see this as a console war thing. I have about 30 games on the Xbox One and well over 200 on the PS4. The PS4 is just offering me less than the competitors in multiple cases so I buy where I get the most for my money. I'm still buying Sony games. I just bought the $75 Nurse Love Syndrome collectors edition for the Vita from Limited Run Games. I still bought Senran Kagura Renewal on the PS4 even though it is censored so I could get all the physical goodies.
Because it likely deemed the content inappropriate and crude. With wriggling fingers from your zipper and 2 naked women laying in bed while someone gives you dating advice. As did most stores except steam.
2.Why Sony allowed and (based on their Twitter) celebrated them bringing Dream Daddy a gay dating simulator in their Store?
Because possibly it did not deem it inappropriate or crude much like it didn't Danganronpa. Not sure why you keep trying to make this about homosexuality and heterosexuality but I guess it has to do with the political bullshit I was talking about and trying to lean this into 'SJWs'
3.Where is your citation that Steam does not curate their Store as good as the other three platform holders?
The fact that I see a lot of shit pass into the store and only get censored after the fact on steam when there is uproar. Like house party. Or rape day being removed from their list after controversy.
4.You said Sony got "in a lot of shit" because of the sexual nature and sexual scenes in Dragon's Dogma and God of War 3, respectively, if this is true.
No I didn't. I said dragons crown and they did.
A.Why is Sony a company that is selling to China, a country that you can get penalized for distributing homosexual content developing The Last of Us 2?
Because it is a huge market and they will likely censor it there to be able to sell there (like Game of thrones did) then I look forward to you complaining about sony and censorship and how you support homosexuality hopefully, not just 'SJW'.
B.Is Sony going to delete the 14-year-old or patch it, scene from TloU: Left behind DLC as to "not get a lot of shit" from the Chinese market? Yes or No?
Have no fucking idea but again how is that relevant when I already told you the difference between your comparison of these games.
Last edited:
Because there is no real reason not to sell them there yet none exist.
I'm not downplaying steam or switch. I'm questioning those who are throwing the baby out with the bath water by recommending something else other than switch or steam. Where they will be able to play literally none of those games.
Are there costumes not available on DOA PS4 or is it just the fact that you cannot buy them as microtransactions. The only thing was DMC5 and it was uncensored. Capcom likely didn't get recertification in the EU/ Australia because the EU actually gets more prude sometimes, look at dead rising censorship on 360 or Conan Exiles on One/PS4. Capcom can remove it and if it is Sony it isn't Sony US HQ enforcing it because they didn't in the US.
Last edited:
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
1.You are misinformed, there are no nude scenes in Super Seducer games, the only sex scene happens off-screen. What is crude about it? And what is innapropriate about it?
2.So a heterosexual dating simulator where the protagonist has off-screen sex is crude, but a homosexual dating simulator where a post-teen has sex with 'daddies' is not crude?
3.I could say that most PS4 exclusives are shit, that does not make my opinion reality, and Rape Day is the definition of a game that had a lot of bad agents against it, most of them SJWs and moral busy-body senators. And it is still not citation, it is just, your opinion! You understand the term 'citation'?
4.Citation that they got in a lot of shit for it, besides Schreier that cuck, soyboy no one gave a shit that Sorceress has big boobs.
A.So you saying that Sony is afraid that they will get a lot of shit if they show women with big boobs and a lot of cleavage from the gaming "journalists" so they are happy to censor theirs and others games to please them, yet they are creating a heavily homosexual game with the intention of taking a lot of BIGGER shit (we are talking fines in the 6 digits here) of one of the strongest governments in the world? Is this what you are saying?
B.So, 2 14-year-olds kissing in the mouth is OK with you? Just asking it here to be sure.
2.So a heterosexual dating simulator where the protagonist has off-screen sex is crude, but a homosexual dating simulator where a post-teen has sex with 'daddies' is not crude?
3.I could say that most PS4 exclusives are shit, that does not make my opinion reality, and Rape Day is the definition of a game that had a lot of bad agents against it, most of them SJWs and moral busy-body senators. And it is still not citation, it is just, your opinion! You understand the term 'citation'?
4.Citation that they got in a lot of shit for it, besides Schreier that cuck, soyboy no one gave a shit that Sorceress has big boobs.
A.So you saying that Sony is afraid that they will get a lot of shit if they show women with big boobs and a lot of cleavage from the gaming "journalists" so they are happy to censor theirs and others games to please them, yet they are creating a heavily homosexual game with the intention of taking a lot of BIGGER shit (we are talking fines in the 6 digits here) of one of the strongest governments in the world? Is this what you are saying?
B.So, 2 14-year-olds kissing in the mouth is OK with you? Just asking it here to be sure.
Endless Fluff
Banned
Either you're ignoring what Sony has said, or you just have not read it.
Of course Conan Exiles was okay... Sony has said that they are specifically targeting Japanese games, because the Japanese have "laxer standards"*. This falls in line with current regressive left think, were almost everything from Japan with a hint of suggestive content is a pedo game (show, manga etc). Sony USA wants to change japanese gaming culture, they want to limit what comes from there.
Sony is currently a twofaced bastard
Sony in the past 12 month: We want to protect the children and we'd also like to ban every Japanese game which has sexual themes.
In the same timeframe also Sony (Funimation): We sell How NOT to summon a Demon Lord which has a a few lolis in very questionable, explicit scenes and outfits... scenes which I'd consider much worse than any game they've censored over the past 12 month.
One Sony is "muh image! protect whamen!", the other Sony is kind of like "I don't care about moral standards, this is what the fans want". It's kind of clear that one side has a very specific agenda... typical for the area where they're stationed (SF). You can't blame people for coming to that conclusion that there is a SJW agenda they're pushing right now.
*I've put that in quotation marks because I think that argument is laughable, especially when it comes to games. The west has pretty much the same standards in gaming, CERO (japanese ratings board for console games) is actually very strict... and I don't want to hear such a statement from someone living in the US, the US that had a limited re-release of Kodomo no Jikan just last year. Kodomo no Jikan JFC. That is the western standard.
CatCouch
Member
Not putting the game on the Xbox does not imply that Microsoft bans it, though. I can't even begin to discuss that since I have no idea if Super Seducer was ever considered for the platform.
It really doesn't matter why some issues are present on the PS4 but not other platforms. The end result is my experience is worse on the PS4 with these games so I'm moving away from Sony when I can. The issues with Sony are quite unpredictable so I've lost confidence.
I really want the ability to buy the DOA6 costumes I want which I can on my XB1. I would need to spend more money to buy bundles on the PS4. That's a tangible issue. Sony has confirmed a censorship policy but can't actually detail it. That is a huge concern for me but it's not the only issue Sony has that's driving me to other platforms.